Tuesday, December 7, 2010
Mailbag!
Thanks to everyone for your emails that didn't actually exist.
The Giants signed Aubrey Huff, which I like, but wasn't it for a bit too much (2 years/$22 mil)? I agree with ESPN's Keith Law that this is contract the biggest mistake a GM can make. I mean, what did this guy do besides put up the best offensive numbers for the World Series Champions?
-Walter,
Portland, OR
Dear Walter,
Yes, it would have been nice for the Giants to have locked down Huff for something more in the 2/18, but World Series. Critics may call this a mistake if they are so inclined. It's easy to come to that conclusion when you look at Huff's career arc, which has been consistently inconsistent. But this arc's ups and downs were forged in Baltimore and Tampa Bay (before they were good). Let's see how Huff responds to finally being a champion before we assume he's due for a downturn.
Can I boo Juan Uribe now? It will feel really good, plus casual fans already thought I was booing anyway.
- Riley
Perham, MN
Dear Riley,
I must admit I'm torn on this one. The difficulty is, how do we show him we appreciate what he's done yet at the same time voice our disapproval for his becoming a dirty Dodger? At the same time, are any of us really surprised that players don't care about the rivalries as much as the fans, and follow the money around? I'm probably going to have a hard time finding the energy to boo him, directly. I will boo the Dodger brand as I normally do and whatever boos trickle their way down to Juan, so be it.
I am hopping mad about the Miguel Tejada signing! Not only is he really old, but hits into double plays, and he's really old! $6.5 million? 1 year? We could have had 1/20 of Jayson Werth for that!
-Marty
Joplin, MO
Dear Marty,
Look, if we learned anything from last year, it's that players can be past their prime and still contribute. I'm not saying that the Giants are going to strike gold like they did last year with Huff and Burrell, but let's keep the signing in perspective: An aging double play machine is what we had at shortstop last year. This one is a lot better at getting on base, one of the most durable guys in baseball, and comes at the third of the cost. And it's only one year. And World Series. Quit complaining.
Pablo Sandoval is fat.
-Salvador
Siloam Springs, AK
Dear Salvador,
The Giants agree with your eloquent assessment that this is Panda's key issue. They've committed a lot of resources and press time to his diet and conditioning. Lose weight, and everything else will be cream cheese. I am in agreement too; I even wrote an entire blog entry about it last month. I'd like to add one more piece of evidence to this theory, and that is that weight is the key issue for anyone, including you, Salvador.
Think about it: You feel a little off, things aren't going right at work, school or personal life, you start to get a little lazy, watching too much TV, eating poorly, etc. What's the first thing you do to get back on track? Stop eating the junk food and start moving around a little more. And it usually works. Before you know it you're a star.
I'm betting the same thing can happen for Pablo.
Monday, November 29, 2010
The Unthinkable
You'll hear it from the Bay Bridge to the Pacific Ocean. From Mendocino to Monterey. Within seconds of hearing the news, I heard it twice on Facebook.
"BOO!"
"Ree-bay!"
Our World Series hero (one of them, at least), with the image of his postseason heroics still fresh in our minds, has fled the glorious land of black and orange for the seedy back-alley of Dodger blue. The sting is not at fierce as it would have been had a homegrown talent who spent his whole career in San Francisco defected to the other side, but given his superhuman feats in the postseason, and this, it stings a little.
That being said, Ned Coletti is paying Uribe $21 million over three years. The Giants would have been foolish if they had given him more or even had matched that offer. The home run in Game 6 in the NLCS and his vacuum-like defense in the World Series will stay with me forever. His .248/.310/.440 line in 2010 will not. Which is a worse line than when the Giants offered him two years at $18 million in 2009. I think it shows much more savvy move to slightly overpay for Aubrey Huff, who was consistent and the Giants leading hitter over the regular season, and let Uribe - with his sparkling post-season - loose, than it would have been to have done the reverse. Bravo, Sabean.
We still do have a shortstop deficiency to address. Just please please please please please don't pursue Derek Jeter.
Saturday, November 20, 2010
The Panda in the Room
Before we talk about any off-season free-agent acquisitions, we need to talk about the giant Panda in the room.
The Giants have hinted that their priorities right now are keeping Huff and Uribe. If those two are retained, and I think they should be (The SS free agent class is pretty meh right now, and they need Huff's bat next year), the only thing standing in the way of the Giants having a solid infield defensively and a solid lineup appears to be 40 lbs. of flesh off of Pablo Sandoval's body.
Seriously. I can't remember another time in baseball when the future of the team so heavily depended on whether or not one guy could successfully go on a diet.
Of course, this is assuming that the weight gain was the key to his sophomore slump. There were other problems, of course, like his inability to square up on a ball, plate discipline, the off-field distractions in Venezuela, and general motivation.
But I'm betting that the Giants are banking on the theory that Pablo's weight was the initial nudge that caused his momentum into those other problems. The first thing I heard about Pablo after the World Series ended was that he was going straight to off-season conditioning in San Diego, so it looks like the Giants moving forward with this theory.
This seems to me a bit like putting Panda on NBC's The Biggest Loser. Everything is heading toward one dramatic moment where he steps on the scale sometime during spring training. And if he can't hit that magic number, he returns his chocolate sundae martini into his favorite food case, wipes a tear from his eye, and hops on a bus to Fresno. It's putting too much stock in one part of the problem.
We all love Pablo Sandoval, and based on his 2009, know that can be great. If the Giants turn out to be right about what can make him great again, we will have the infield of Huff, Sanchez, Uribe and the non-2010 Pablo to work with, with phenom Brandon Belt in line to inherit the 1B job and Brandon Crawford waiting in the wings at short. And this is an arrangement I'd be okay with.
Thursday, November 18, 2010
Rookie of the Year ...and Beyond!
This year, for some reason, the individual awards just didn't hold as much of my attention as they have in earlier years. In the past, I might have felt that Andres Torres was robbed of a Gold Glove after a performance in the field like the one he turned in this season, but this year I couldn't care less that he didn't win it. In November of 2008 and 2009, I was locked in to Tim Lincecum and the Cy Young Award race. 2010? Not on my radar at all. And although I didn't feel like Tim deserved it this year, they could have given the 2010 Cy Young to Jonathan Broxton and it wouldn't have mattered to me. So what is the reason for this season's indifference to the individual trophies?
Oh yeah. It must be that this trophy is a lot shinier.
Buster being the ROY, though, is a little different. I holds a little more significance, because after meeting and in some cases exceeding our very high expectations for him, Buster Posey has now stepped into a future in which the San Francisco Giants are his team. We all know that Buster will be an All-Star level or possibly elite catcher for the next ten or so years. But he is poised to become the leader of the Giants for those ten years. Rookie of the year, and World Series champion. Last guy to do that? Derek Jeter. He became the face of the franchise for a very successful decade.
I can see Buster in the Jeter mold - Calm, poised, and really hated by the people who hate him. Currently, Dodger fan friends down here claim to admire him. One friend, while discussing the World Series, even shook his head, smiled, and said, "Man, I wish the Dodgers had that guy." Three seasons from now, though, especially if the Giants continue to experience success, you can bet on Buster Posey being Public Enemy no. 1 in L.A. the same way that Jeter is hated in Boston. In fact I'm looking forward to hearing the boos grow increasingly louder in Chavez Ravine next season when his name is announced.
Cheers, Buster!
Friday, November 12, 2010
Withdrawl
It's been almost two weeks, and I still wish there was a baseball game on tonight. And why can't there be one? Everyone's still around. You're telling me they can't get together to play just one more game? Invite the Rangers. Heck, you can even invite Buck and McCarver. Throw in a Due Date commercial every fifteen seconds if that sweetens the deal. I don't care, as long as the Giants are there.
Tuesday, November 2, 2010
Pause... For Reflection
Since last night, I've watched the clip of the Brian Wilson's last strikeout of Nelson Cruz maybe 25 times. It was a gorgeous swinging strikeout on a cutter inside, which was nice to see after the called strike three at the knees to Ryan Howard to end the NLCS, and the close call at first base to end the NLDS in Atlanta. It was a no-doubter. And it also hit the perfect dramatic note of being thrown on a 3-2 pitch. It's my favorite moving image of all time.
Monday, November 1, 2010
Speechless
The Giants won the World Series. The Giants are world champions. The Giants won the World Series. The Giants are world champions. The Giants won the World Series. The Giants are world champions. The Giants won the World Series. The Giants are world champions.
Friday, October 29, 2010
...and what have you done with the real Giants?
When the real Freddy Sanchez returns to earth, and the mashed up combination of the DNA of Ted Williams and Mango from late '90's Saturday Night Live that has been playing in his place is returned to the aliens, he will ask what happened.
When the real Cody Ross returns to earth, and the mashed up combination of the DNA of Babe Ruth and Rob Corddry that has been playing in his place is returned to the aliens, he will ask what happened.
When the real Edgar Renteria is returned to earth, and the mashed up DNA of Ozzie Smith and the Draw Me Turtle that has been playing in his place is returned to the aliens, he will ask what happened.
Speaking of DNA, mine prevents me from declaring this World Series a done deal. We have a travel day, Arlington, Texas, and a Jonathan Sanchez road start to get through. But, there have been 50 teams in the history of Baseball to go up 2-0 in the Fall Classic. 41 of them have won the series. The team that is currently up 2-0 looks loose, groovy and is making all the right moves. The other team alternates between looking dejected and looking like they are unraveling. And their DNA is made of pop ups.
It feels good to be in the driver's seat.
Monday, October 25, 2010
Predicting the Unpredictable
As I did before the NLDS and the NLCS, I visited ESPN's website to check out what their resident experts had to say about the upcoming World Series and... Surprise! They unanimously predicted that the Texas Rangers would win the series.
The experts are going out on a limb here and reasoning that the Rangers have a better offense than the Giants. Hmm - I hadn't thought of it that way. That's some hard-hitting sports journalism. Surely, you might think, the Giants have had dominant starting pitching all season, so they have the edge there, right? Not so fast, my dear simple-minded fan. Here's another edgy insight for you: The Rangers 1-2-3 might be just as good. In fact, their number one starter is making history in the post season and might have a slight edge over Tim Lincecum. This is some real, Bob Costasy, Outside the Linesy type stuff.
I don't really disagree with this assessment of the two teams, but I am tired of hearing it. And it's not just because I'm a homer who doesn't like to hear anything bad the Giants. I know the Giants have their weaknesses. I will fully admit that, with a few exceptions, the Giants are sketchy defensively, show the patience of a kid on Christmas morning at the plate, and on the basepaths, most of them look like plumbers running to catch the van after they forgot to put on the parking brake. I would feel a lot more confident about their chances in the World Series if these things weren't true.
But the Braves series and the Phillies series didn't play out according to the conventional assessment of the teams, and I don't think this one will either. I think the national writers and experts are finally starting the realize that Bochy is a shrewd game manager, but could they - or anyone - have forseen him being able to stitch together a patchwork quilt of Affeldt, Bumgarner, Lopez, Lincecum, and Wilson for the win after Sanchez' meltdown? Two starters, two bullpen guys and your closer for seven innings of scoreless relief?
If one improbable thing can happen, then why can't they just keep happening? Here are my predictions for the World Series, which I maintain are just as probable as any other result:
- The Giants beat Cliff Lee in Game One. He's been dominant, but he's a strike thrower. He doesn't pitch out of the zone, but he should because the Giants are hacks and that's what they swing and miss at: garbage pitches out of the zone. Juan Uribe and Cody Ross, who both have good lifetime numbers on Lee, go deep.
- The Giants go 2-0 at AT & T, partly because of the advantage they have there but mostly because Matt Cain. Josh Hamilton's drives continue to die in triples alley, and in the late innings he is vexed by Javi Lopez. After two games, Hamilton is 1 for 8 with two strikeouts.
-In Texas, the homefield advantage is neutralized in the same way it was in Philly (The Giants hit four home runs in Citizens' Bank Park to the Phillies' four). They outhomer the Rangers in the three games there four to two, on their way to winning games four and five.
So, yes, I'm saying Giants in five. Improbable, but would you really be that surprised?
World Series!
My heart rate - which first quickened during Sanchez' meltdown in the first inning and skyrocketed during the eighth and ninth - has finally stabilized. I've come to terms with the fact that this Giants team that I adore - a team that will probably not score more than five runs in any game for the remainder of the postseason - will in fact play in the World Series and I am not dreaming. I've liked all of my friends' Giants related stati on Facebook.
Friday, October 22, 2010
Repositioning Frowns so that the Top Side Faces Downward
Monday, October 18, 2010
Spoiler Alert!
Thursday, October 14, 2010
My Favorite Picture So Far This Week
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
Why the Giants Will Beat the Phillies
Monday, October 11, 2010
Victory! Giants Advance to NLCS
Friday, October 8, 2010
You win some, you... this.
Thursday, October 7, 2010
Lincecum Throws Complete Game Shutout, Strikes Out 14
With three days in between the last pitch of the division title clinching game on Sunday and the first pitch of Game One of the NLDS, everything was under the microscope. The 25-man roster, Barry Zito, Aaron Rowand, The strength of Braves pitching, the inconsistency of the Giants offense, Bruce Bochy's beard, Buster Posey's lack thereof, Bobby Cox's 401K, etc. Anything to fill in the 72 hours of unbaseball.
Of course, for good measure, baseball minds threw in Lincecum's so-called "up and down" season into the discussion ring. To be sure, he had a horrible August this year (7.28 ERA). But I can't call Lincecum's 2010 up and down, mostly due to the fact that August of 2010 was possibly the only down month of his entire life. It was a worry, but after September I think everyone was confident he had put it behind him. This didn't stop the announcers from using the phrase "roller-coaster season" during his warm ups last night.
I have to admit that before the game I was thinking about the 2009 All Star game. Lincecum got the start and wilted a little bit in the spotlight during that game. For me it was cause for concern that the Freak could freak out on a big stage. After Infante's leadoff double, I wondered if it was happening again. Then, in the second inning, when he started striking everyone out, I knew he was not only going to win the game, but possibly close the book on the rap against him.
Tim Lincecum has been a star for awhile, but I feel like we're watching the emergence of a superstar. He's getting to that point where when there is doubt, he can just throw it aside effortlessly. Listen to him during the post game press conference. It's boring:
Reporter: "How did you do this incredible thing?" Tim: " Well, things were obviously working."
Reporter: "Is this your best game ever?" Tim: "It's hard to rank them, I just try to give my team a chance to win."
He's not amazed at himself. It's just a matter of fact. And when the amazing becomes a matter of fact, that's when superstars are made.
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
A Post Season Poem
Tuesday, October 5, 2010
Feel Good Post
Monday, October 4, 2010
Zito and the Playoffs
Sunday, October 3, 2010
We're In!
Thursday, September 30, 2010
One More Win
The Giants seem to be operating on of those rare planes of awesome lately. They recognize how important it is to win right now and they are just doing it. They are willing themselves to win in a way that I haven't seen in maybe 17 years. I'm not including the late-period Bonds years, because there were stretches where Bonds carried the team on his back, and the other players just kind of managed their parts well. Now, they are operating as a team.
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
4 Games to Go...
Monday, September 20, 2010
12 Games to Go...
...until I'm either jumping for joy or sitting with my head in my hands. And from the looks of the jam-packed NL west standings, I'm sure I won't know until October 3rd has come and gone.
An intriguing question. As it stands now, here is how the rotation would fill out the rest of the season:
9/21 Cain @ Cubs
9/22 Sanchez @ Cubs
9/23 Bumgarner @ Cubs
9/24 Lincecum @ Colorado
9/25 Zito @ Colorado
9/26 Cain @ Colorado
9/27 Off
9/28 Sanchez vs. Arizona
9/29 Bumgarner vs. Arizona
9/30 Lincecum vs. Arizona
10/1 Zito vs. San Diego
10/2 Cain vs. San Diego
10/3 Sanchez vs. San Diego
With everyone kind of peaking, it's hard to make an argument that anything should be changed. In fact, the most compelling argument I've heard either way is that everyone has been solid. That if you mess with the rhythm, disaster may soon follow.
I think the motivation behind tweaking with the rotation is that everyone is secretly afraid of Bumgarner pitching the THIS IS IT game that decides our season. I'll admit that I'm afraid of it. I'm also afraid of one of the hot hitters going into a slump, all of the slumping hitters not finding their way out their slumps, Pablo Sandoval swinging at a pickoff throw to first, Jonathan Sanchez walking the entire opposing lineup in the first inning, Buster Posey collapsing from exhaustion into a pile of bones and peach fuzz, Tim Lincecum melting into a puddle of sweat, Andres Torres somehow having a second appendix which also bursts, and a thousand other things. But the fear of a young pitcher being shouldered with the most important game of the series is thicker, because we are all still traumatized from Salomon Torres' start on the final game of the 1993 season. (Note: This link is for readers who may not be Giants fans or aware of this game. Giants fans proceed with caution. You know what you are clicking on and may not want to relive it).
Fortunately for everyone, this isn't 1993. I'm not looking at college brochures and The Proclaimers' "I'm Gonna Be (500 Miles)" is no longer playing on the radio 500 times a day, so I'm fairly certain. And the last game of the season might not be the most crucial one. For all we know the THIS IS IT game could be Lincecum's start vs. Arizona. Or the division could be clinched some night while the Giants aren't even on the field. Right now they are all crucial games, or at least they should all be treated as such. We can't leave Bumgarner in some waiting room thumbing through magazines until his "safe" start is available - and I wouldn't want to. He's a much more valuable starter than Torres was and we should be using him.
Other things nobody knows: Who's going to be the hottest pitcher or suddenly have a bad start. Before Sunday's beautiful start against the Brewers would anyone have picked Zito to start the THIS IS IT game? Now Zito suddenly has a ton of backers. Right now, the guy I have the most confidence in would probably be either Sanchez or Cain. But both of those guys are just a bad start away from everyone dreading their next start. The Giants need to trust their rotation, not just 3/5 of 4/5 of it. It's tricky to tweak your way into the playoffs. Winning games is usually much more effective.